Archive for June, 2006

Google Unanswers

Tuesday, June 6th, 2006

I know that you, like I, are fascinated by all things having to do with Google Answers; otherwise, how did you get here, and why are you reading this?

And sooner or later, every afficianado-ga comes face-to-face with an obvious conundrum: Why do so many Google Answers questions go unanswered?

This is a good question. But it, itself, is a hard one to answer.

Some reasons are obvious, like the customers who offer up their two bucks and want a list of every zip code in the United States, the names and addresses of each person within each zip code, whether they own or rent, and a special check mark next to all those who have blue eyes.

And there are other GA clients who establish a certain, er, reputation among the researchers for being difficult to please — endless clarifications, poor ratings, and unrelenting mission creep. Out of a sense of professional decorum, I offer no links to such queries.

Still, there are plenty of questions like the one about diesel and gas engines that seem answerable, but don’t get answered (the poor guy even asked a follow up question wanting to know why his other question wasn’t answered…but the follow-up is in danger of going unanswered too!).

Here’s another one that went begging, on medieval church history, and this one at a hundred bucks.

Nor is there any shortage of unanswered $200 questions, like the customer looking for marketing contacts at banks, or any of these.

Which brings us back to the main topic: Why so many questions that get no answers?

I have my pet notions about this, and I hope to post these in days to come (I’m learning not to promise ahead on posts that I may or may not be able to get around to…).

But in the mean time, what of my fellow researchers and GA question-askers, and even the inveterate peanut gallery…and of course, anyone else who stumbles across this post.

What do you all think?

pafalafaga aka David Sarokin

 

 P.S.  Here’s a good example of a problemmatic question, due to:

–extreme lowballing on the price

–not knowing quite when to stop asking for things (had they stopped at #1, they had a chance at getting an answer), and

–asking for information that probably doesn’t exist

Choosing a question to answer

Monday, June 5th, 2006

How do researchers choose which Google Answers questions they wish to answer?

Obviously, one major factor is to consider the price set by the customer, weighed against the expected time to find the answer. Another factor to consider is how interesting the research process will be, or how satisfying the answer will be. A further factor is whether the subject is one with which the researcher is already familiar.

For me, there’s one criterion that is more important than all the others. Perhaps surprisingly, the difficulty of the question is not the main issue. The main criterion is this: when I have found the answer, am I confident that the asker will find the answer acceptable?

If I can’t be confident that my answer will be acceptable, it opens the door to all kinds of disappointments: an answer that the asker would rather not be told, or an answer to a different question from the one that the asker really had in mind, or an answer that’s correct but at quite the wrong level. Occasionally the customer doesn’t even want an answer but wants a dialogue.

Sometimes these situations can be repaired using the clarification process, but sometimes it just isn’t possible to provide an alternative answer that satisfies.

So, if anyone reading this is considering asking a question, please make it crystal-clear what kind of answer would satisfy you!

Ya-hoo knows if they’re right or wrong?

Friday, June 2nd, 2006

I use MyYahoo as my personal homepage. It’s well-organized, and offers many features, both useful and fun.

Among other things, I enjoy reading the daily Ask Yahoo Q&A’s. The questions are often the type that spark one’s curiousity…Yeah, just why is that the way it is…? And the answers tend to be well and cleverly written.

But, as an inveterate Google Answers researcher, I can tell you this… they’re not always right! In fact, I’m increasingly finding that the answers provided are of…ahem…dubious scholarship, and sometimes just plain wrong.

Take their recent Hole-in-the-Wall question, asking about the origination of the phrase. Ask Yahoo answers that the earliest use of the term to mean a small, simple, (and probably dingy) sort of establishment dates back to about 1822.

Hmmm. They only missed it by a century or so.

The Hole in the Wall was a well-known London alehouse back in the 18th century (and who knows…maybe earlier). You can see it on this old London map from the 1740’s (look for the small yellow circle, middle of the map, left-hand side).

I found a record of an attempted theft at the Hole-in-the-Wall that dates back to 1717. You can read the actual trial transcript, which is a trip. Seedy bars in the 1700’s sound a lot like seedy bars today:

…The Prosecutor deposed, that as she was passing along near Charing-Cross, at about 11 a Clock at Night, the Prisoner William North came to her, and invited her to go in and drink with him, which she refused, telling him that she was no Whore, and he might find some that were; he walking by her till they came to the Sign of the Hole in the Wall, attempted to push her into the House, and that she being in pain left her Glasses should be broke, went in, and to humour him did taste of a Pint of Drink, and would fain have gone away, but the Prisoner would not let her, using some threatning Expressions…

The transcript is from a terrific site, The Proceedings of the Old Bailey, which have searchable trial transcripts dating back to 1674. Yet another great history resource.

Why did the researchers looking into this question miss the real history on it? I’ll have to Ask Yahoo!

Cheers,

pafalafaga David Sarokin

Google Answers for Lawyers

Friday, June 2nd, 2006

One of the principle tasks of a lawyer is research…lots of it! Even the most well-staffed law firm may find itself occasionally (continuously?) overwhelmed by the amount of work that needs to be done in finding the best case law, conducting due diligence, untangling an intellectual property dispute, or looking for that prior art that you just know is out there, somewhere.

Lawyers can certainly hire a consulting service to assist them when its crunch time, but that takes a lot of effort to arrange, and a substantial budget to pull off.

Where to turn, when you need some fast, quality research assistance that won’t break the bank?

How about Google?

No, not Google, the automated search engine. Google, the researcher-staffed Answers service, which can be found at http://answers.google.com

Google Answers is as obscure as Google itself is famous. But it is a terrific service, especially for a lawyer in need of adjunct research talent. For a very modest fee, a team of Google Answers researchers stands ready 24/7 to provide high-quality, fast-turn-around work with almost no administrative hassle.

How Google Answers Works

Google has on contract a team of several hundred carefully-screened expert researchers. All of them are highly-skilled at using Google to mine the web, and uncover those little needles of information in the cyber-haystack that is the internet. But beyond simple Google searches, many of the researchers have access to other sources of information familiar to any law firm — Lexis-Nexis, Factiva, PACER, UCC records, and so on.

If you need the services of a researcher, you simply post your question to Google Answers, and set a fee. Whichever researcher feels that he or she can answer the question — and also feels that the price offered is fair! — will ‘lock’ the question and get to work on it. For a well-focused, attractively-priced question, you will often have an answer back in just a day or two, or in mere hours if you need it faster.

If a question needs some clarification, you and the researcher can engage in an online dialogue to pinpoint your needs more precisely.

What Google Answers Can Do

The best way to get a feel for what Google Answers can do, is to read through some of the questions and answers with a legal bent. Here’s a synopsis of a few questions my fellow researchers and I have worked on, along with a link to the full Q&A:

Due Diligence
Texas Sterling Construction
Researcher provided a detailed competitor-analysis that covered corporate identity, management, safety record, litigation, project awards, customer base, environmental issues, etc.

Prior Art
Early Online Frequent Shopper Programs
Google Answers provided documented examples of “electronic S&H stamps” prior to a specified date.

Divorce Law
Question about marital property in Virginia Research offered statute and case law pertaining to status of marital and separate property in the state of Virginia.

Intellectual Property — International
Intellectual property in the country of Beloruss
Provided an overview of the law and current practices regarding IP protection in Belarus

International Law
Conflict of Interest
An answer provided legal precedents in Canada for what constitutes a professional conflict of interest for architects.

Attorney Malpractice
PA case law
Client looking for a difficult-to-find example of misappropriated authority turned to Google Answers

Sanctions
Someone wants to know: What would happen to a lawyer in California who was arrested for using drugs?
There are Q&A’s at Google Answers that pertain to just about any area of law you can name. The site’s search function will let you easily explore other questions that may be of particular interest.
 

A Few Caveats

Google Answers can be an exceptionally valuable resource for the legal community. A key asset is its ease of use. It takes only minutes (and a credit card) to set up an account with Google. Simply click on the “Create a Google Account” link on the main Google Answers page to get started.

However, there are a few caveats worth noting about how Google Answers works:

–Everything posted at Google Answers is anonymous (you are identified only by a user name of your choice). At the same time, everything posted is publicly viewable. There is no option for direct, private communication between a lawyer and a researcher.

–Google Answers researchers will not provide information on living, private individuals. If you’re trying to track down the current address of a client’s long-lost sister, Google Answers is NOT the service for you.

–Google Answers cannot provide full copies of copyrighted materials, though they can certainly provide excerpts, full citations, or direct you to links for relevant materials.

–The maximum price that can be offered at Google Answers is $200 per question. While this can make the service an incredible value, it is also a constraint for larger projects. Of course, you can always post multiple $200 questions, but this is a bit awkward to manage. For a large effort, it’s best to engage a would-be researcher in a bit of dialogue to work out the best arrangement.

–And bear in mind that, as good as these researchers are, their real expertise in is in searching…very few of them are actual trained legal professionals.

As a final note, suppose you engage Google Answers and are unhappy with the results (it’s rare…but it does happen). The service has a very generous refunds policy…ask, and ye shall receive.

pafalafaga aka David Sarokin

Ancient Egypt IV - The Expulsion

Thursday, June 1st, 2006

Amenhotep and his driver were standing in his chariot only a couple of places away from his king.

Pharaoh Ahmose ( Moses in the language of the Hyksos ) had completed an agreement with the Hyksos that they should leave the country and go where they will.

Amenhotep thought back over the events of the past few years.

Seqenenra Tao II had been killed during a raid on the Hyksos and the war had been put on hold while a new king ascended the Theban Throne, the Pharaoh Kamose. Then Kamose went north to attack. He surprised and defeated the southernmost Hyksos garrison at Nefrusy, ( near modern Asyut ), and then led his army as far north as the neighborhood of the Hyksos capital of Avaris itself. Though that city was not taken, the fields around it were laid waste by the Thebans. The Hyksos king had outlived his first Egyptian contemporary, Seqenenra Tao II, and was still on the throne of a much reduced kingdom at the end of Kamose’s brief reign.

About the time of Kamose’s death, he had received a dispatch from Thebes addressed to “Overseer of the Royal Stables, Amenhotep,” It began, “Excellency, your father, the Noble Digshotep, has flown to the Sun.”

Amenhotep had reached the most prestigious and highly prized rank in Egypt’s army, Overseer of the Royal Stables, and he had delayed writing his father about it for too long.

After the death of Kamose and the enthronment of Ahmose, a few years had passed before Ahmose took to the field against the Hyksos. Ahmose was only ten years old when he became king of Egypt. Amentotep grinned at the memory of his father trying to say his sister had hung on the young prince’s arm as a ploy in trying to keep him from studying medicine.

Fifteen years had passed since then and after several battles and a long seige of the city of Avaris, the Hyksos were ready to call it quits and leave. Now Amenhotep was simply waiting to find out if the King were going to accompany the departing hord. It seems he might as he wants to make sure these shepherds do not turn around and return.

He was also awaiting word from the Admiral of the newly refurbished Egyptian Navy, which had been instrumental in winning several of the battles. If the king decided to escort the Hyksos out of the country, he wanted to know the Navy’s readiness to follow along the coast as floating supply depots for the land bound army.

Amenhotep’s personal feelings were that they should not go with the Hyksos since there was new pressure building from Nubia in the south that needed attention soon. Nubia could also be a source of wealth that the kingdom needed badly.

Another reason the king wanted to go, besides not wanting the Hyksos to turn back, is that part of the surrender terms included Egypt providing guides through the wilderness to Palestine. Egyptian traders knew the route as well as anybody, and so did the Hyksos. However, they did not want to depend on Hyksos guides as such guides could slip away and perhaps have Hyksos allies waiting in ambush along the route. The king stressed that Egyptians needed to be in control of the exodus.

They knew of the special winds that would blow the waters of the Reed Sea away from the shallow north end allowing people to pass before the wind failed and the waters returned. They knew of the ’secret’ traders springs which were sealed when not in use. A few blows from a spear or staff would break the seal and allow water to flow. Such sealed springs and wells were also common along the trade routes of the Eastern Desert to the mines and the Red Sea ports, Western Desert routes as well. These are natural cisterns formed of special layers of clay. The clays hinder water from local rainfall penetraing deep into the sandstone, therefore, creating underground water resources that could be easily tapped or that would have even formed natural outlets at topographically favorable places. And if one knew what to look for, symbols identifying these springs lined the trade routes across the desert.

Well, the word is in, we are going.

Ahmose drove the Hyksos as far as Sharuhen, where they resisted the expulsion. After a three year seige, they were defeated again and driven on.

I shall end this segment on Egyptian history with a quote from a later historian named Josephus Flavius.

“That the shepherds built a wall round all this place, which was a large and a strong wall, and this in order to keep all their possessions and their prey within a place of strength, but that Thummosis the son of Alisphragmuthosis made an attempt to take them by force and by siege, with four hundred and eighty thousand men to lie rotund about them, but that, upon his despair of taking the place by that siege, they came to a composition with them, that they should leave Egypt, and go, without any harm to be done to them, whithersoever they would; and that, after this composition was made, they went away with their whole families and effects, not fewer in number than two hundred and forty thousand, and took their journey from Egypt, through the wilderness, for Syria; but that as they were in fear of the Assyrians, who had then the dominion over Asia, they built a city in that country which is now called Judea, and that large enough to contain this great number of men, and called it Jerusalem.”
- Josephus Flavius, Against Apion, Book 1:14

Please note: - Ahmose is considered the founder of Egypt’s Great 18th dynasty. However, there was no ‘family’ change, only a ‘historic’ change. The 18th dynasty was a continuation of the same Royal Family that was the 17th dynasty.

A special note: - Whether this is, or is not, the basic event that was written of later by Israeli historians as “The Exodus” is not for me to say is, or is not, the case in this post.

My personal belief is that it is. It would be more politic for such historians to say “we escaped” than it would be to say “we were kicked out on our butts.” Your own belief will depend on your own research and the directions you take it.

Please remember that people such as David M. Rohl, who completely reinvented a chronology of Egyptian history to match Biblical timelines (mainstream archaeology does not accept it) and Ron Wyatt, who is not an archaeologist, but a anesthesia/surgical nurse from Tennessee, involved strongly with ‘fringe’ archaeology and promotes himself as an expert in the field, are “not” accepted as valid archaeological or historical researchers by mainstream archaeologists and historians. - - Though for reasons of your own, you may.

Till next time

Digs

For more information about life in Ancient Egypt: http://www.archaeolink.com/ancient_egyptian-civilization.htm

Of gravity, celery and panties…

Thursday, June 1st, 2006

Every few months I cruise over to lileks.com for a healthy dose of the absurd.

The site, with the tag line “Humiliating Defenseless Ephemera Since 1996″ is a riot. Lileks skewers our strange American culture of decades past with a loving, witty and tender poke in the eye.

Like his exaltation of home decorating disasters (though the best materials have been removed from the site and made into a book…nothing against books, but boo…hiss!) at Interior Desecrations, or the equally, riotously caustic category of Regrettable Foods (also, alas, now a book).

My last visit, I explored some of the nooks and crannies of the site, and lo and behold, here is a tribute to one of America’s greatest but least-known — and certainly strangest — artists, Art Frahm. Frahm specialized in pin-up style works of women with celery whose underwear (the woman’s not the vegetable’s) refuses refuses to stay put.

You may find the paintings amusing, odd, or perverse, but Lilek’s stream-of-subconsciousness commentary is hilarious, no matter what.

What can I possibly say...?

As Lileks himself puts it: “It is unfair to judge Art Frahm by these illustrations. He did many that were much, much worse…”

Enjoy

pafalafaga David Sarokin