<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google as predicted in 1964</title>
	<atom:link href="http://web-owls.com/2007/06/25/google-as-predicted-in-1964/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://web-owls.com/2007/06/25/google-as-predicted-in-1964/</link>
	<description>Searching and Researching</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 13:02:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://web-owls.com/2007/06/25/google-as-predicted-in-1964/comment-page-1/#comment-118454</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-owls.com/2007/06/25/google-as-predicted-in-1964/#comment-118454</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one who sees the machine on the desk as a 1960s vintage Friden Flexowriter? (a teletype like device)

Also, flat screen TVs that hang on the wall like a picture were one of the future devices that geeks dreamed of around 1970, so it seems reasonable that someone had the idea in &#039;64.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one who sees the machine on the desk as a 1960s vintage Friden Flexowriter? (a teletype like device)</p>
<p>Also, flat screen TVs that hang on the wall like a picture were one of the future devices that geeks dreamed of around 1970, so it seems reasonable that someone had the idea in &#8216;64.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harald</title>
		<link>http://web-owls.com/2007/06/25/google-as-predicted-in-1964/comment-page-1/#comment-85527</link>
		<dc:creator>Harald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-owls.com/2007/06/25/google-as-predicted-in-1964/#comment-85527</guid>
		<description>Actually the book predicts Wolfram&#124;Alpha ;-)
(http://www.wolframalpha.com/)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the book predicts Wolfram|Alpha ;-)<br />
(<a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wolframalpha.com/</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Nix</title>
		<link>http://web-owls.com/2007/06/25/google-as-predicted-in-1964/comment-page-1/#comment-84257</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Nix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-owls.com/2007/06/25/google-as-predicted-in-1964/#comment-84257</guid>
		<description>That is absolutely amazing !

I was laughing myself silly but remember similar books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is absolutely amazing !</p>
<p>I was laughing myself silly but remember similar books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradstor</title>
		<link>http://web-owls.com/2007/06/25/google-as-predicted-in-1964/comment-page-1/#comment-84144</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradstor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-owls.com/2007/06/25/google-as-predicted-in-1964/#comment-84144</guid>
		<description>One thing which hasn&#039;t been mentioned here is that the screen display ratio is 18:9 (yes, I measured it). Very close to the 16:9/10 we use nowadays!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing which hasn&#8217;t been mentioned here is that the screen display ratio is 18:9 (yes, I measured it). Very close to the 16:9/10 we use nowadays!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cappozzi</title>
		<link>http://web-owls.com/2007/06/25/google-as-predicted-in-1964/comment-page-1/#comment-77036</link>
		<dc:creator>Cappozzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-owls.com/2007/06/25/google-as-predicted-in-1964/#comment-77036</guid>
		<description>Very interesting !!! I love &quot;Mary had a little lamb&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting !!! I love &#8220;Mary had a little lamb&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manswer</title>
		<link>http://web-owls.com/2007/06/25/google-as-predicted-in-1964/comment-page-1/#comment-76483</link>
		<dc:creator>manswer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 05:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-owls.com/2007/06/25/google-as-predicted-in-1964/#comment-76483</guid>
		<description>I think we&#039;re still far off. Look closely at the prediction. What&#039;s missing? Ads everywhere, unexpected phonograph porn, and at-least-I-tried web design. /s

The guy who wrote this obviously had very good insight and sense of the practical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we&#8217;re still far off. Look closely at the prediction. What&#8217;s missing? Ads everywhere, unexpected phonograph porn, and at-least-I-tried web design. /s</p>
<p>The guy who wrote this obviously had very good insight and sense of the practical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiwi</title>
		<link>http://web-owls.com/2007/06/25/google-as-predicted-in-1964/comment-page-1/#comment-74964</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiwi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-owls.com/2007/06/25/google-as-predicted-in-1964/#comment-74964</guid>
		<description>You&#039;d think &#039;The Answer Machine&#039; would be voice activated instead of using a typewriter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d think &#8216;The Answer Machine&#8217; would be voice activated instead of using a typewriter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grocery</title>
		<link>http://web-owls.com/2007/06/25/google-as-predicted-in-1964/comment-page-1/#comment-23345</link>
		<dc:creator>grocery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-owls.com/2007/06/25/google-as-predicted-in-1964/#comment-23345</guid>
		<description>Love doing homework using old typewriter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love doing homework using old typewriter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joy</title>
		<link>http://web-owls.com/2007/06/25/google-as-predicted-in-1964/comment-page-1/#comment-22333</link>
		<dc:creator>Joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-owls.com/2007/06/25/google-as-predicted-in-1964/#comment-22333</guid>
		<description>Neat!...love the flat LCD screen..^^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat!&#8230;love the flat LCD screen..^^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://web-owls.com/2007/06/25/google-as-predicted-in-1964/comment-page-1/#comment-22255</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web-owls.com/2007/06/25/google-as-predicted-in-1964/#comment-22255</guid>
		<description>ok this would be great, but all the google owners had to do was look in that book for an idea.
then boom out comes google.

example-
a book says &quot;in the future there will be a machine that will have the ability to teleport people&quot;

all someone would have to do is read that book and then try to make one.

and also the book could of been written in like 1960 and still people are probably all ready trying to make one.

i understand were your going.
it would be more impressive if the book was undercover and not avalible to anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok this would be great, but all the google owners had to do was look in that book for an idea.<br />
then boom out comes google.</p>
<p>example-<br />
a book says &#8220;in the future there will be a machine that will have the ability to teleport people&#8221;</p>
<p>all someone would have to do is read that book and then try to make one.</p>
<p>and also the book could of been written in like 1960 and still people are probably all ready trying to make one.</p>
<p>i understand were your going.<br />
it would be more impressive if the book was undercover and not avalible to anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

